As I mentioned last week, I wasn’t really sure where my script of Lock the Doors stood. I had gotten success initially, when all I was really looking for was feedback, but then when I tried to follow that success, I was surprised to find it non-existent. I decided at that point what was best for me was to stick with the initial plan, to seek out feedback.
Scriptapalooza was offering that, not as part of another screenwriting contest, but as a focused review of the first 20 pages of the screenplay. This felt worthwhile because I had heard several times that if a screenplay didn’t hook someone in the first fifteen, maybe even ten pages, they would just put it down and move on to the next script.
This review would be a good litmus test for my script.
So how did it do?
Honestly…poorly.
I had thought that I had set myself up pretty well pacing-wise in those initial twenty pages. It started out a little slow, admittedly, but it also introduced nearly all of the main characters, with the last one just arriving onto the scene around the twenty page mark, established the conflict, and even had the first tense scene that resulted in the first murder. For horror, this usually happened within the first couple pages, so again, I admit it started a little slow, but it still got there, established the stakes, and started to raise them.
The reviewer did not share my assessment of my first twenty.
They seemed intrigued by side characters more than the main ones who were in a bigger chunk of the script, even the first twenty pages. They said the characters all sounded the same. They were even saying they didn’t buy small actions like a character accidentally setting a siren off.
The experience wasn’t all bad. The feedback did identify some blind spots I had for my script. For instance, they wanted to flesh out a character mentioned in the script who was actually dead, something that was obvious in the book, but something I acknowledge I hadn’t conveyed in the screenplay. While I had identified this as horror, and its set in an isolated cabin in the woods, I think its fair they may have wanted to push me to develop characters who typically become fodder in these types of stories. And they had questions about where the story was going which I wanted to shout “You’ll get these answers if you read the whole thing!” but in fairness, their assignment was to only read the first twenty.
They also included a four rank scoring system from “Poor” to “Excellent.” Unfortunately, I was across the board “Fair” which was one rank above “Poor.” I knew that this evaluation was not of me as a writer, but of me as a screenwriter, but I was still expecting better of myself.
In the end, I had gotten feedback like I wanted. I just didn’t like the feedback I got.